A seguir estão listados os artigos consultados nas diferentes sessões da cartilha.

​

• Ajzen, I. 1988. Attitudes personality and behavior. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK.

• Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

• Appleby, M. C., Weary, D. M. and Chua, B. 2001. Performance and feeding behaviour of calves on ad libitum milk from artificial teats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 74: 191-201.

• Asheim, L. J., Johnsen, J. F., Havrevoll, Ø., Mejdell, C. M. and Grøndahl, A. M. 2016. The economic effects of suckling and milk feeding to calves in dual purpose dairy and beef farming. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies: 1-12.

• AVMA. 2014. Literature review on the welfare implications of the dehorning and disbudding of cattle. https://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/LiteratureReviews/Pages/Welfare-Implications-of-Dehorning-and-Disbudding-Cattle.aspx. Accessed 16 October 2015.

• Becker, B. G. and Lobato, J. F. P. 1997. Effect of gentle handling on the reactivity of zebu crossed calves to humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 53: 219-224.

• Bernieri, L. 2016. Barreiras e oportunidades para minimizar a dor na descorna de bezerras, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.

• Bøe, K. E. and Færevik, G. 2003. Grouping and social preferences in calves, heifers and cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80: 175-190.

• Boissy, A. and Le Neindre, P. 1997. Behavioral, cardiac and cortisol responses to brief peer separation and reunion in cattle. Physiology & Behavior 61: 693-699.

• Boogaard, B. K., Bock, B. B., Oosting, S. J., Wiskerke, J. S. C. and van der Zijpp, A. J. 2011. Social acceptance of dairy farming: The ambivalence between the two faces of modernity. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 24: 259-282.

• Borderas, T. F., de Passille, A. M. B. and Rushen, J. 2009. Feeding behavior of calves fed small or large amounts of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 2843-2852.

• Bran, J. A., Daros, R. R., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., LeBlanc, S. J. and Hötzel, M. J. 2018. Cow- and herd-level factors associated with lameness in small-scale grazing dairy herds in Brazil. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 151: 79-86.

• Britto, L. C. F., Machado Filho, L. C. P., Hötzel, M. J., Alves, A. A., Barcellos, A. O. and Labarrere, J. G. 2011. Physiological and behavioral response of crossbred zebu dairy cows submitted to different shade availability on tropical pasture. 45th Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology,. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Indianpolis.

• Broom, D. M. 1991. Animal-welfare - concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Science 69: 4167-4175.

• Broom, D. M. and Fraser, A. F. 2010. Comportamento e bem-estar de animais domésticos. Manole, Rio de Janeiro,.

• Burton, R. J. F., Peoples, S. and Cooper, M. H. 2012. Building 'cowshed cultures': A cultural perspective on the promotion of stockmanship and animal welfare on dairy farms. Journal of Rural Studies 28: 174-187.

• Cardoso, C., von Keyserlingk, M. and Hötzel, M. J. 2017. Brazilian citizens: Expectations regarding dairy cattle welfare and awareness of contentious practices. Animals 7: 89.

• Cardoso, C. S. 2014. Sustentabilidade da pecuária leiteira no sul do Brasil: atitudes e práticas de agricultores familiares sobre amochamento e descorna de bezerros. Masters, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.

• Cardoso, C. S., Daros, R. R., Balcão, L. F., Costa, J. H. C., Longo, C., Marquette, G. A., Rodrigues, G. V. and Hötzel, M. 2013. Manejo e bem-estar de bezerros leiteiros em Santa Catarina. Cadernos de Agroecologia 8: 15133.

• Cardoso, C. S., Hötzel, M. J., Weary, D. M., Robbins, J. A. and von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. 2016a. Imagining the ideal dairy farm. Journal of Dairy Science 99: 1663-1671.

• Cardoso, C. S., Uler-Gómez, C. and Hötzel, M. J. 2012. Decision-making of family farmers in Santa Catarina regarding husbandry practices that influence the welfare of dairy cattle 49ª Reunião da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia No. 49. SBZ, Brasília.

• Cardoso, C. S., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. and Hötzel, M. J. 2016b. Trading off animal welfare and production goals: Brazilian dairy farmers' perspectives on calf dehorning. Livestock Science 187 102–108.

• Coimbra, P. A. D., Pinheiro Machado Filho, L. C. and Hötzel, M. J. 2012. Effects of social dominance, water trough location and shade availability on drinking behaviour of cows on pasture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 139: 175-182.

• Coleman, G. J. and Hemsworth, P. H. 2014. Training to improve stockperson beliefs and behaviour towards livestock enhances welfare and productivity. Revue Scientifique Et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties 33: 131-137.

• Coleman, G. J., Hemsworth, P. H., Hay, M. and Cox, M. 2000. Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 11-20.

• Cooper, M. D., Arney, D. R. and Phillips, C. J. C. 2007. Two- or four-hour lying deprivation on the behavior of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 1149-1158.

• Costa, J., von Keyserlingk, M. and Weary, D. 2016. Invited review: Effects of group housing of dairy calves on behavior, cognition, performance, and health. Journal of Dairy Science 99: 2453-2467.

• Costa, J. H. C., Burnett, T. A., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. and Hötzel, M. J. 2018. Prevalence of lameness and leg lesions of lactating dairy cows housed in southern Brazil: Effects of housing systems. Journal of Dairy Science 101: 2395-2405.

• Costa, J. H. C., Hötzel, M. J., Longo, C. and Balcão, L. F. 2013. A survey of management practices that influence production and welfare of dairy cattle on family farms in southern Brazil. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 307-317.

• Croney, C. C. and Anthony, R. 2011. Invited review: Ruminating conscientiously: Scientific and socio-ethical challenges for US dairy production. Journal of Dairy Science 94: 539-546.

• Daros, R. R., Costa, J. H. C., Von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Hötzel, M. J. and Weary, D. M. 2013. Individual housing impairs reversal learning in dairy calves. In: 47º International congress of the ISAE, Florianópolis, Brazil. p 88.

• Darós, R. R., Hötzel, M. J., Bran, J. A., LeBlanc, S. J. and von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. 2017. Prevalence and risk factors for transition period diseases in grazing dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 145: 16-22.

• Dawkins, M. S. 2004. Using behaviour to assess animal welfare. Animal Welfare 13: S3-S7.

• Dawkins, M. S. 2006. A user's guide to animal welfare science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 77-82.

• Dawkins, M. S. 2008. The science of animal suffering. Ethology 114: 937-945.

• de Passille, A. M. 2001. Sucking motivation and related problems in calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 175-187.

• de Passillé, A. M., Rushen, J. and Janzen, M. 1997. Some aspects of milk that elicit non-nutritive sucking in the calf. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 53: 167-173.

• de Passille, A. M., Rushen, J., Ladewig, J. and Petherick, C. 1996. Dairy calves' discrimination of people based on previous handling. Journal of Animal Science 74: 969-974.

• de Paula Vieira, A., Guesdon, V., De Passille, A. M., Von Keyserlingk, M. A. and Weary, D. M. 2008. Behavioural indicators of hunger in dairy calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109: 180-189.

• Dolan, S. and Nolan, A. M. 2008. Pain and pain management: a pharmacological perspective. OIE Technical Series, Paris, France.

• Duffield, T. F. 2008. Current data on dehorning calves 41st Annual Convention of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners. p 25–28. American Association of Bovine Practitioners, Auburn, AL.

• Duncan, I. J. H. 2006. The changing concept of animal sentience. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100: 11-19.

• Duve, L. R., Weary, D. M., Halekoh, U. and Jensen, M. B. 2012. The effects of social contact and milk allowance on responses to handling, play, and social behavior in young dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 6571-6581.

• Ellis, K. A., Billington, K., McNeil, B. and McKeegan, D. E. F. 2009. Public opinion on UK milk marketing and dairy cow welfare. Animal Welfare 18: 267-282.

• Enríquez, D., Hötzel, M. J. and Ungerfeld, R. 2011. Minimising the stress of weaning of beef calves: a review. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 53: 28.

• Fajt, V. R., Wagner, S. A. and Norby, B. 2011. Analgesic drug administration and attitudes about analgesia in cattle among bovine practitioners in the United States. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 238: 755-767.

• Fernandes, C. O. M., da Rosa, L. C. M., Koroll, V. and Portes, V. M. 2012. Manejo do rebanho leiteiro. In: U. A. Córdova (ed.) Produção de leite à base de pasto em Santa Catarina. p 335-395. EPAGRI, Florianópolis, Brazil.

• Flower, F. C. and Weary, D. M. 2001. Effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf: 2. Separation at 1 day and 2 weeks after birth. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 70: 275-284.

• Flower, F. C. and Weary, D. M. 2003. The effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf. Animal Welfare 12: 339-348.

• Fraser, D., Weary, D. M., Pajor, E. A. and Milligan, B. N. 1997. A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare 6: 187-205.

• Fulwider, W. K., Grandin, T., Rollin, B. E., Engle, T. E., Dalsted, N. L. and Lamm, W. D. 2008. Survey of dairy management practices on one hundred thirteen north central and northeastern United States dairies. Journal of Dairy Science 91: 1686-1692.

• Gottardo, F., Nalon, E., Contiero, B., Normando, S., Dalvit, P. and Cozzi, G. 2011. The dehorning of dairy calves: Practices and opinions of 639 farmers. Journal of Dairy Science 94: 5724-5734.

• Hammell, K. L., Metz, J. H. M. and Mekking, P. 1988. Sucking behaviour of dairy calves fed milk ad libitum by bucket or teat. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 275-285.

• Hammon, H. M., Steinhoff-Wagner, J., Flor, J., Schoenhusen, U. and Metges, C. C. 2013. Role of colostrum and colostrum components on glucose metabolism in neonatal calves. Journal of Animal Science 91: 685-695.

• Hanna, D., Sneddon, I. A. and Beattie, V. E. 2009. The relationship between the stockperson's personality and attitudes and the productivity of dairy cows. Animal 3: 737-743.

• Hemsworth, P. H. 2003. Human-animal interactions in livestock production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 185-198.

• Hemsworth, P. H., Coleman, G. J., Barnett, J. L., Borg, S. and Dowling, S. 2002. The effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 80: 68-78.

• Hewson, C. J., Dohoo, I. R., Lemke, K. A. and Barkema, H. W. 2007. Factors affecting Canadian veterinarians' use of analgesics when dehorning beef and dairy calves. Canadian Veterinary Journal-Revue Veterinaire Canadienne 48: 1129-1136.

• Hoe, F. G. H. and Ruegg, P. L. 2006. Opinions and practices of Wisconsin dairy producers about biosecurity and animal well-being. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 2297-2308.

• Honorato, L. A., Hötzel, M. J., de Miranda Gomes, C. C., Barbosa Silveira, I. D. and Pinheiro Machado Filho, L. C. 2012. Particularities of the human-animal interactions relevant to the welfare and productivity of dairy cows. Ciencia Rural 42: 332-339.

• Honorato, L. A., Machado Filho, L. C. P., Silveira, I. D. B. and Hötzel, M. J. 2014. Strategies used by dairy family farmers in the south of Brazil to comply with organic regulations. Journal of Dairy Science 97: 1319–1327.

• Hötzel, M. J. 2005. Bem-estar de animais zootécnicos: Aspectos Éticos, Científicos e Regulatórios, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.

• Hötzel, M. J. 2014. Improving farm animal welfare: Is evolution or revolution needed in production systems? In: M. C. Appleby, D. M. Weary and P. Sandoe (eds.) Dilemmas in Animal Welfare. p 67-84. CABI, Oxfordshire, UK.

• Hötzel, M. J., Honorato, L. A. and Machado Filho, L. C. P. 2014a. Bem-estar animal e a produção leiteira. In: J. C. P. M. Silva, C. M. Veloso, M. O. Franco and A. S. Oliveira (eds.) Manejo e Administração na Bovinocultura Leiteira No. 2. p 367-390. Universidade do Leite, Viçosa.

• Hötzel, M. J., Longo, C., Balcão, L. F., Cardoso, C. S. and Costa, J. H. C. 2014b. A survey of management practices that influence performance and welfare of dairy calves reared in Southern Brazil. PLoS ONE 9: e114995.

• Hötzel, M. J. and Machado Filho, L. C. P. 2004. Bem-estar animal da agricultura do século XXI. Revista de Etologia 6: 3-15.

• Hötzel, M. J., Machado, L. C. P., Yunes, M. C. and da Silveira, M. 2005. An aversive milker causes fear, but does not influence milk yield of Holstein cows. Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 34: 1278-1284.

• Hötzel, M. J., Roslindo, A., Cardoso, C. S. and von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. 2017. Citizens’ views on the practices of zero-grazing and cow-calf separation in the dairy industry: Does providing information increase acceptability? Journal of Dairy Science 100: 4150-4160.

• Hötzel, M. J. and Sneddon, J. N. 2013. The role of extensionists in Santa Catarina, Brazil, in the adoption and rejection of providing pain relief to calves for dehorning. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 1535-1548.

• Hötzel, M. J., Teixeira, D. L. and Machado Filho, L. C. P. 2013. A hierarquia social e o regime de oferta influenciam o consumo de água em bovinos leiteiros. Revista Brasileira de Agroecologia 8: 84-91.

• Hurnik, J. F., Webster, A. B. and Siegel, P. B. 1995. Dictionary of farm animal behavior. Iowa State University Press, Aimes.

• Huxley, J. N. and Whay, H. R. 2006. Current attitudes of cattle practitioners to pain and the use of analgesics in cattle. Veterinary Record 159: 662-+.

• Jasper, J. and Weary, D. M. 2002. Effects of ad libitum milk intake on dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 85: 3054-3058.

• Jensen, M. B. 2006. Computer-controlled milk feeding of group-housed calves: The effect of milk allowance and weaning type. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 201-206.

• Johnsen, J. F., Zipp, K. A., Kälber, T., Passillé, A. M. d., Knierim, U., Barth, K. and Mejdell, C. M. 2016. Is rearing calves with the dam a feasible option for dairy farms?—Current and future research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 181: 1-11.

• Jung, J. and Lidfors, L. 2001. Effects of amount of milk, milk flow and access to a rubber teal on cross-sucking and non-nutritive sucking in dairy calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 201-213.

• Keeling, L. J. and Gonyou, H. W. 2001. Social behaviour in farm animals. Cabi Publishing, Oxon.

• Keil, N. M. and Lnaghans, W. 2001. The development of intersucking in dairy calves around weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 295-308.

• Khan, M. A., Weary, D. M. and Von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. 2011. Invited review: Effects of milk ration on solid feed intake, weaning, and performance in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 94: 1071-1081.

• Krohn, C. C. 2001. Effects of different suckling systems on milk production, udder health, reproduction, calf growth and some behavioural aspects in high producing dairy cows - a review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 271-280.

• La Fontaine, D. 2002. Dehorning and castration of calves under six months of age. Agnote: J83.

• Lidfors, L. 1993. Cross-sucking in group-housed dairy calves before and after weaning off milk. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 15-24.

• Lund, V. and Rocklinsberg, H. 2001. Outlining a conception of animal welfare for organic farming systems. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 14: 391-424.

• Machado Filho, L. C. P., Ribas, C. E. D. and Hötzel, M. J. 2010. Transição para uma pecuária Agroecológica. In: R. P. Lana, G. Guimarães and G. S. Lima (eds.) II Simpósio Brasileiro de Agropecuária Sustentável No. 1. p 243-258. SIMBRAS, Viçosa.

• Machado, L. C. P., Teixeira, D. L., Weary, D. M., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. and Hötzel, M. J. 2004. Designing better water troughs: Dairy cows prefer and drink more from larger troughs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 89: 185-193.

• MAPA. 2008. Instrução Normativa Nº 56, 6 de novembro de 2008, Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, Diário Oficial da União.

• MAPA. 2011. Portaria nº 524. Comissão Técnica Permanente de Bem-Estar Animal – CTBEA. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

• Margerison, J. K., Philips, C. J. C. and Preston, T. R. 1996. The effect of restricted suckling and non-suckling systems on dairy cow and calf behaviour. British Society of Animal Science 62: 665.

• Margerison, J. K., Preston, T. R., Berry, N. and Phillips, C. J. C. 2003. Cross-sucking and other oral behaviours in calves, and their relation to cow suckling and food provision. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80: 277-286.

• Mendl, M., Burman, O. H. P. and Paul, E. S. 2010. An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 277: 2895-2904.

• Munksgaard, L., de Passille, A. M., Rushen, J. and Ladewig, J. 1999. Dairy cows' use of colour cues to discriminate between people. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 1-11.

• Munksgaard, L., Jensen, M. B., Pedersen, L. J., Hansen, S. W. and Matthews, L. 2005. Quantifying behavioural priorities-effects of time constraints on behaviour of dairy cows, Bos taurus. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92: 3-14.

• Nordquist, R., van der Staay, F., van Eerdenburg, F., Velkers, F., Fijn, L. and Arndt, S. 2017. Mutilating procedures, management practices, and housing conditions that may affect the welfare of farm animals: Implications for welfare research. Animals 7: 12.

• OIE. 2013. Terrestrial Animal Health Code. 22 ed. World Organisations for Animal Health, Paris, France.

• Pajor, E. A., Rushen, J. and de Passille, A. M. B. 2000. Aversion learning techniques to evaluate dairy cattle handling practices. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69: 89-102.

• Pajor, E. A., Rushen, J. and de Passille, A. M. B. 2003. Dairy cattle's choice of handling treatments in a Y-maze. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80: 93-107.

• Pettersson, K., Svensson, C. and Liberg, P. 2001. Housing, feeding and management of calves and replacement heifers in Swedish dairy herds. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 42: 465-478.

• Phillips, C. 2002. Cattle behaviour and welfare. 2 ed. Blackwell Science, UK.

• Pinheiro Machado, T. M. 2009. Comportamentos afiliativos em vacas leiteiras a pasto, o papel da lambida, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.

• Price, E. O. 1999. Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 245-271.

• Prickett, R. W., Norwood, F. B. and Lusk, J. L. 2010. Consumer preferences for farm animal welfare: results from a telephone survey of US households. Animal Welfare 19: 335-347.

• Reardon, S. 2016. The CRISPR zoo. Nature 531: 160-163.

• Reich, L. J., Weary, D. M., Veira, D. M. and von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. 2010. Effects of sawdust bedding dry matter on lying behavior of dairy cows: A dose-dependent response. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 1561-1565.

• Rennie, L. J., Bowell, V. A., Dearing, J. M., Haskell, M. J. and Lawrence, A. B. 2003. A study of three methods used to assess stockmanship on commercial dairy farms: Can these become effective welfare assessment techniques? Animal Welfare 12: 591-597.

• Ribeiro, A. C. C. L., Junqueira, M. M., Furlong, J. and Otênio, M. 2010. Saúde Animal. In: A. M. Auad (ed.) Manual de bovinocultura de leite. p 427-540. Embrapa Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.

• Robbins, J. A., Weary, D. M., Schuppli, C. A. and von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. 2015. Stakeholder views on treating pain due to dehorning dairy calves. Animal Welfare 24: 399-406.

• Rosa, M. S. 2002. Interação entre retireiros e vacas leiteiras na ordenha, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal.

• Roth, B. A., Barth, K., Gygax, L. and Hillmann, E. 2009. Influence of artificial vs. mother-bonded rearing on sucking behaviour, health and weight gain in calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 119: 143-150.

• Rushen, J. and De Passillé, A. M. 1995. The motivation of non-nutritive sucking in calves, Bos taurus. Animal Behaviour 49,: 1503-1510.

• Rushen, J., de Passillé, A. M. B., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. and Weary, D. M. 2008. The welfare of cattle. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.

• Rybarczyk, P., Koba, Y., Rushen, J., Tanida, H. and de Passille, A. M. 2001. Can cows discriminate people by their faces? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 74: 175-189.

• Rybarczyk, P., Rushen, J. and de Passille, A. M. 2003. Recognition of people by dairy calves using colour of clothing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 307-319.

• Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K., Booth-McLean, M., McAllister, T. and Mears, G. 2005. Physiological and behavioural changes in Holstein calves during and after dehorning or castration. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 85: 131-138.

• Seo, T., Sato, S., Kosaka, K., Sakamoto, N., Tokumoto, K. and Katoh, K. 1998. Development of tongue-playing in artificially reared calves: effects of offering a dummy-teat, feeding of short cut hay and housing system. Applied Animal Behavior Science 56: 1-12.

• Sepulveda-Varas, P., Huzzey, J. M., Weary, D. M. and von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. 2013. Behaviour, illness and management during the periparturient period in dairy cows. Animal Production Science 53: 988-999.

• Silva, J. C. P. M. 2011. Manejo de bezerras leiteiras. Aprenda Fácil, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.

• Soberon, F., Raffrenato, E., Everett, R. W. and Van Amburgh, M. E. 2012. Preweaning milk replacer intake and effects on long-term productivity of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 783-793.

• Soberon, F. and Van Amburgh, M. E. 2013. The effect of nutrient intake from milk or milk replacer of preweaned dairy calves on lactation milk yield as adults: A meta-analysis of current data. Journal of Animal Science 91: 706-712.

• Spurlock, D. M., Stock, M. L. and Coetzee, J. F. 2014. The impact of 3 strategies for incorporating polled genetics into a dairy cattle breeding program on the overall herd genetic merit. Journal of Dairy Science 97: 5265-5274.

• Stafford, K. J. and Mellor, D. J. 2011. Addressing the pain associated with disbudding and dehorning in cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135: 226-231.

• Stilwell, G., de Carvalho, R. C., Lima, M. S. and Broom, D. M. 2009. Effect of caustic paste disbudding, using local anaesthesia with and without analgesia, on behaviour and cortisol of calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116: 35-44.

• Stock, M. L., Baldridge, S. L., Griffin, D. and Coetzee, J. F. 2013. Bovine dehorning assessing pain and providing analgesic management. Veterinary Clinics of North America-Food Animal Practice 29: 103-+.

• Teixeira, D. L., Hötzel, M. J. and Machado, L. C. P. 2006. Designing better water troughs - 2. Surface area and height, but not depth, influence dairy cows' preference. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 96: 169-175.

• Vasseur, E., Borderas, F., Cue, R. I., Lefebvre, D., Pellerin, D., Rushen, J., Wade, K. M. and de Passille, A. M. 2010. A survey of dairy calf management practices in Canada that affect animal welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 1307-1315.

• Veissier, I., Care, S. and Pomies, D. 2013. Suckling, weaning, and the development of oral behaviours in dairy calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 147: 11-18.

• Veissier, I., Gesmier, V., Leneindre, P., Gautier, J. Y. and Bertrand, G. 1994. The effects of rearing in individual crates on subsequent social-behavior of veal calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 199-210.

• Ventura, B. A., Von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Schuppli, C. A. and Weary, D. M. 2013. Views on contentious practices in dairy farming: The case of early cow-calf separation. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 6105-6116.

• Volpato, G. L., Giaquinto, P. C., de Castilho, M. F., Barreto, R. E. and Goncalves de Freitas, E. 2009. Animal welfare: from concepts to reality. Oecologia Brasiliensis 13: 5-15.

• von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Rushen, J., de Passille, A. M. and Weary, D. M. 2009. The welfare of dairy cattle-Key concepts and the role of science. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 4101-4111.

• von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. and Weary, D. M. 2010. Opportunities and challenges in dairy calf housing and management for the next decade. In: L. Goby (ed.) 3rd Boehringer Ingelheim Expert Forum on Farm Animal Well-being. p 7-11, Barcelona, Spain.

• von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Wolf, F., Hötzel, M. J. and Weary, D. M. 2006. Effects of continuous versus periodic milk availability on behavior and performance of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 2126-2131.

• Waiblinger, S., Menke, C. and Coleman, G. 2002. The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 79: 195-219.

• Winder, C. B., LeBlanc, S. J., Haley, D. B., Lissemore, K. D., Godkin, M. A. and Duffield, T. F. 2016. Practices for the disbudding and dehorning of dairy calves by veterinarians and dairy producers in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Dairy Science 99: 10161-10173.

• Yunes, M. C. 2018. Knowledge and attitudes of the Brazilian public on animal welfare in production systems. PhD, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brail.

• Yunes, M. C., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. and Hötzel, M. J. 2017. Brazilian citizens’ opinions and attitudes about farm animal production systems. Animals 7: 75.

• Zucali, M., Bava, L., Tamburini, A., Guerci, M. and Sandrucci, A. 2013. Management risk factors for calf mortality in intensive Italian dairy farms. Italian Journal of Animal Science 12: e26.